Analysis of factors influencing the use of agile methodologies in IT project management
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-2-47-55
Abstract
In the context of high uncertainty and rapid change in the field of information technology, the effective application of agile project management methodologies is becoming increasingly relevant. However, in practice, the degree of flexibility can vary significantly depending on contextual factors. The aim of this study is to analyze which factors influence the level of project management flexibility in Russian IT companies.
The research was conducted through an online survey of professionals working in the field of innovation project management. The level of flexibility was assessed using a scoring system based on responses to four key areas: requirements gathering, planning, communication with the customer, and communication within the team. The resulting scores were compared with characteristics of the respondents such as experience, industry, company size, team size, and the perceived innovativeness of the project.
The article presents the results of the analysis of the relationship between these factors and the level of project management flexibility. The findings show that the most significant influence is exerted by the manager’s experience and the degree of project innovativeness, while company size and team size are not decisive factors.
About the Authors
G. Y. Postnikov
Synergy University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student
Moscow
A. G. Dmitriev
Synergy University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department Head, Organizational Management Department
Moscow
References
1. Chulanova, O.L. Project and Project Team Management Technology based on Agile Project Management Methodology / O.L. Chulanova. Eurasian Science Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 37. EDN XNHVZB.
2. Almukhametov, A.I., Dmitriev A.G. Flexible Project Management Methodologies / A.I. Almukhametov, A.G. Dmitriev. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship. 2023. Vol. 22, No. 2. P. 11–17. DOI 10.24182/2073-6258-2023-22-2-11-17. EDN ICFWBT.
3. Lebedeva E.O. The role of artificial intelligence in automating decision-making processes in project management. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2025. Т. 18. № 1. P. 65–72. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-202518-1-65-72.
4. Nigmatullin, R.K., Dmitriev A.G. Flexible, Classical, and Hybrid Project Management Methodologies: Advantages and Disadvantages / R.K. Nigmatullin, A.G. Dmitriev. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2023. Vol. 16, No. 2. P. 70–78. DOI 10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-2-70-78. EDN KILNDB.
5. Slavin, B.B. Modern Forms of Flexible Management Systems in Organizations in Russia / B.B. Slavin. Management Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12, No. 4. P. 48–62. DOI 10.26794/2304-022X-2022-12-4-48-62. EDN NDELXG.
6. Umerenkov, D.I., Dmitriev A.G. Criteria for Choosing a Flexible Methodology for IT Projects / D.I. Umerenkov, A.G. Dmitriev. Academy Bulletin. 2022. No. 4. P. 71–80. DOI 10.51409/v.a.2022.12.04.009. EDN WADCMC.
7. Raeva, T.D. Analysis of the Application of Flexible Technologies in Project Management in Russia and Abroad / T.D. Raeva. Collection of Scientific Papers of Russian Universities «Problems of Economics, Finance, and Production Management». 2018. No. 43. P. 53–58. EDN YPPDRJ.
8. Vakorin, M.P. Formation of IT Project Management Methodology based on Flexible Project Management Process Structure / M.P. Vakorin, E.V. Kryukov. Young Scientist. 2023. No. 9(456). P. 10–12. EDN GLWTKQ.
9. Bogdanov, V. Project Management. Corporate System – Step by Step. – Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (MIF), 2012. 241 p.
10. Wolfson, B. Flexible Development Methodologies. Ver. 1.2. Moscow, 2013. 112 p.
11. Agile Software Development Manifesto [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/ru/manifesto.html (Date of access: 20.03.2024).
12. Andrew Stellman, Jennifer Greene. Learning Agile. – Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (MIF), 2015. 650 p.
13. Holtsnider B., Wheeler T., Stragand G. Agile Development & Business Goals / Elsevier Inc, 2015. 256 p.
14. Gulyuk N.V. Principles of Successful Project Management. Business Education in Knowledge Economy. 2017. No 2 (7), pp. 36–49. – Access mode: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29094112 (Date of access: 20.03.2024).
15. Zarubina A.A. Project Management: Applying Scrum Method in Marketing Projects. Business Education in Knowledge Economy. 2017. No. 3 (8), pp. 48–50. Access mode: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30311188 (Date of access: 20.03.2024).
16. Plotnikov A.N., Plotnikov D.A. Current Issues in Project Management. Izv. Sarat. unta. Nov. ser. Ser. Economics. Management. Law. 2014. Vol. 14, Iss. 1. P. 152–158. Access mode: https:// doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-1-2-152-158 (Date of access: 20.03.2024).
17. Tkachenko I.N., Sivokoz K.K. Using Agile and Scrum Flexible Technologies for Stakeholder Management in Projects. Manager. 2017. No 4(68). P. 85–95. – Access mode: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/2018/427 (Date of access: 20.03.2024).
18. Falko S.G. Traditional, Flexible, and Hybrid Models and Standards of Project Management. Management of Scientific and Technical Projects: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Technical Conference, Moscow, April 6, 2018. Bauman MSTU. – Moscow, 2018. P. 258–261.
19. Postnikov G.Y., Dmitriev A.G., Research on the implementation degree of agile project management methodologies in russian IT-companies. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2024. Т. 17. № 2. P. 50–58. https://doi.org/ 10.24182/2073-9885-2024-17-2-50-58 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Postnikov G.Y., Dmitriev A.G. Analysis of factors influencing the use of agile methodologies in IT project management. Scientific notes of the Russian academy of entrepreneurship. 2025;24(2):47-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-2-47-55
Views:
76
Email this article 
