Development of a Methodological Approach to QMS Maturity Assessment for Differentiating Between Nominal and Effective Models
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-4-46-52
Abstract
The article addresses a fundamental scientific problem in quality management system: the methodological gap between the nominal (formal) possession of a Quality Management System (QMS) certificate and the effective (substantive) functioning of the system. It is argued that existing assessment frameworks, including standard certification audits and macro[statistical analysis, fail to objectively differentiate between these two states, which leads to a distorted evaluation of QMS as a driver of enterprise competitiveness. To resolve this scientific task, the author proposes an original methodological approach to assessing the QMS maturity level. The methodology is based on five key dimensions and twenty measurable indicators, enabling a verifiable scoring[based evaluation and an objective classification of the system as either a nominal or an effective model. The proposed approach serves as an essential diagnostic tool for further empirical research into the economic impact of QMS on organizational performance.
About the Author
A. V. GoldinRussian Federation
Postgraduate Student
Moscow
References
1. Drankova N.A., Denisova Ya.V. Problems of Efficiency of the Quality Management System and Ways to Solve Them in the New Economic Environment. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2023, T. 21, No. 1, pp. 65–73.
2. Kolesnichenko-Yanushev S.L., Klyucharev A.A., Emelyanov A.D. Quality management system effectiveness as a condition for ensuring enterprise competitiveness. Natural-Humanitarian Research. 2024. No. 4 (64). Pp. 594–599.
3. Khokhlova E.B. Analysis of problems arising in the process of creating a quality management system using ISO 9001. Vestnik of Moscow State Academy of Business Administration. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 110–112.
4. Chelenko A.V., Kovaleva O.A. Key problems in implementing a quality management system at domestic machine-building enterprises. Izvestia Tula State University. Technical Sciences. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 327–330.
5. Gumerov A.V. Quality management system in the general management system of an industrial enterprise. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2010. Т. 11. No. 10–1. Pp. 68–72.
6. Sigitova M.A. Leadership styles in various quality management systems. Vestnik TOGU. 2023. No. 3 (70). Pp. 111–120.
7. Kolomytseva O.Yu. Improving the management of economic security of industrial enterprises in the context of digitalization based on the development of personnel involvement. Social Sphere. 2023. No. 4 (58). Pp. 10–14.
8. Filonova V.E., Lymareva O.A. Creating an inspiring work environment for employees as a factor of strategic personnel management. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2024. No. 10-2 (116). Pp. 149–152.
Review
For citations:
Goldin A.V. Development of a Methodological Approach to QMS Maturity Assessment for Differentiating Between Nominal and Effective Models. Scientific notes of the Russian academy of entrepreneurship. 2025;24(4):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-4-46-52



























